NYT (NYT) Stock Library — Charged Alpha

Competitive view

NYT vs. two close competitors

This section compares the current company against two nearby peers on valuation, growth, margins, balance-sheet strength, and investment setup. Green generally marks the strongest relative figure for that row, while red marks the weakest.

NYT

YouTube

Latest video

Q1 FY2026

Growth profile looks strong right now, with above-average top-line and/or earnings momentum.

Cash generation stands out versus market value, which helps the stock absorb valuation pressure better than weaker cash converters.

Valuation sits in a middle zone where future upside likely depends more on quarterly execution than on multiple re-rating alone.

Risk profile looks relatively manageable compared with many peers, especially if operating execution remains stable.

Market Cap

More scale can mean deeper resources and resilience, although bigger does not automatically mean better upside.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

$3.11T

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

$251.02B

Qualcomm Inc.

Trailing P/E

Lower trailing P/E can indicate a cheaper valuation relative to trailing earnings, but it may also reflect slower growth or higher perceived risk.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

24.9x

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

25.6x

Qualcomm Inc.

Forward P/E

Forward P/E is often a better read on what investors are paying for the next year of earnings power.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

21.6x

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

22.4x

Qualcomm Inc.

Revenue Growth

Higher revenue growth usually signals stronger demand, market share gains, or a business still in expansion mode.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

18.3%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

-3.5%

Qualcomm Inc.

Earnings Growth

Faster earnings growth matters because it shows management is converting sales momentum into shareholder value.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

23.4%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

173.0%

Qualcomm Inc.

Operating Margin

Higher operating margin suggests better operating discipline, pricing power, or a structurally stronger business model.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

46.3%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

22.1%

Qualcomm Inc.

Gross Margin

Gross margin helps show how much product-level pricing power and unit economics a company has before overhead.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

68.3%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

54.8%

Qualcomm Inc.

Net Margin

Higher net margin means more of each dollar of revenue reaches the bottom line after all costs.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

39.3%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

22.3%

Qualcomm Inc.

Return on Equity

ROE shows how efficiently management turns shareholder capital into profits, though leverage can inflate it.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

34.0%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

36.1%

Qualcomm Inc.

Free Cash Flow Yield

Higher free cash flow yield can indicate a stronger cash return relative to the stock's market value.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

1.2%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

3.8%

Qualcomm Inc.

Debt to Equity

Lower leverage usually means less balance-sheet risk, though capital-intensive sectors naturally run higher debt loads.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

30.27x

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

55.98x

Qualcomm Inc.

Current Ratio

A stronger current ratio usually signals better short-term liquidity and more room to absorb shocks.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

1.28x

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

2.37x

Qualcomm Inc.

Beta

Lower beta often means lower volatility versus the market, while higher beta usually brings a rougher ride.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

1.09

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

1.49

Qualcomm Inc.

Dividend Yield

Dividend yield matters for income-focused investors, but a high yield can also reflect a stressed stock price.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

0.8%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

1.7%

Qualcomm Inc.

Analyst Upside

Higher analyst upside suggests the Street still sees room between current price and consensus fair value.

NYT

—

NYT

MSFT

33.9%

Microsoft Corp.

QCOM

-25.3%

Qualcomm Inc.

NYT

Market context for NYT

NYT vs. two close competitors

Episode archive for NYT